Speakers of the session
Adam FarkasEuropean Banking Authority, Executive Director
Alban AucoinCrédit Agricole S.A., Head of Public Affairs
Mario NavaEuropean Commission, Director, Horizontal Policies, DG for Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union
Jérôme ReboulMinistry of Economy and Finance, France, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Banking Affairs, DG Trésor
Objectives of the sessionUnlike credit institutions, investment firms do not accept deposits and do not grant loans on a large scale (independently of transactions in financial instruments). Beside credit institutions, investment firms (IFs) play an important role notably in the context of the Capital Markets Union. According to the European Banking Authority (EBA), there are approximately 6,000 IFs in the European Economic Area (EEA), 55% of which are in the United Kingdom. Of these 6,000 IFs, 2,780 benefit from the European passport (75% of which are British IFs).
Until now, these IFs were subject to prudential rules similar to those imposed in the EU on credit institutions. The Commission has proposed to modulate the prudential requirements for IFs, and their corresponding supervisory arrangements, according to their size. The largest IFs would remain subject to the prudential regime defined by CRR and CRD and supervised as large credit institutions by the European Central Bank. Smaller IFs (categories 2 and 3) would benefit from a lighter prudential regime and their supervision would be the responsibility of national supervisors.
Brexit changes the stakes of these developments, which may lead to the creation of a regulatory context making it possible to circumvent the third-country regime set up by the MiFID 2 Directive. Indeed, in this case certain (small?) IFs whose parent company is located in third countries, would have access to the European market with lighter requirements than credit institutions and IFs whose parent company is located in the Member States.
The objective of this session is to find out whether the on-going negotiations at the European level will ensure fair competition conditions between EU banks and FIs, and FIs from third countries, and more generally provide EU capital markets with an appropriate level of control.
Points of discussionWhat are the main features of the proposed Investment firm prudential regime? What is at stake regarding systemic risk and competition in the single market?
Are there any issues raised by the EU parliament or the Council on this topic? What are the main potential fair competition issues raised by the proposed framework between investment firms and banks, notably in the context of the Brexit and new equivalence arrangements regarding supervision?
How is the proposed legislation evolving in this area and what are the necessary improvements?